The external appearance is rough and beaten up as if used in a working environment.  There is/was no lid to the box.  The box was never carved in an ornate manner.  It is ugly as it was designed to be.  The top lip or edge of the box is rounded, not fitted. 

Look at how severely the corner is broken on the box itself.  What would it take to break/wear this corner this way?  It would take dozens of impacts from very large, very heavy objects, wouldn�t it?  Look closely at the box.  Since there was never a dead body in this room, and the room was sealed is it likely this was simply a �tool� for building the structure?  Look closely at the box.  This �break� is not man-made, it is not simple, it is a complicated breaking pattern from an extended mechanical operation. 

As we look internally the box is too long and too narrow to house a body.  What would/could it house?  We shall see in the attached drawing as found from studies of the Great Architect.  Do you want to see what this box was for?  Click here!  INVERSION TOOL PDF.

As we can see from the Inversion Tool drawing set this is a working tool, not a burial device.  Download now!

As we move onwards look at the following drawing from the Smythe exploration in the mid-1800�s.

From the Smythe drawing we know that it took 9 slabs of stone to cover the overhead.  Since each stone is approximately the same width we can likely assume the end �half� stones will tell us the amount of coverage on each lip of the overhead we have, which is 2 feet or so at each end.  By looking at the �solid slabs� only we see seven solid slabs and two half-slabs cover the roof for a total of eight slabs.  Since the room is 34 feet long we can approximate the width of the slabs by dividing 34 feet by 8 slabs, making each slab a little more than 4 feet wide.  Since we know the slabs are about 20 inches thick we can see that each one would fit nicely into the inversion tool (Which some erroneously call a "sarcophagus"), explaining the damages we see.

Now look at the south wall of the drawing as represented in the fold out of the drawing.  The south wall opposite the opening/doorway shows evidence of damage, impact, cracking, etc.  This is evidence of poor handling and control of large rock slabs at the time of construction.  As you look at our inversion tool drawing set we demonstrate how the slabs would be moved in to the room from the north (Grand Gallery ramp) and would likely impact the opposing wall.  Notice only this wall has the impact and the impact pattern fits perfectly with our mechanical drawing set.  Note also, the height of the impact/damage.  This height of impact fits perfectly with a room filled with two 20 inch slab sets, leveling the floor with the top of the �coffer�(Inversion tool).  Again, this confirms our inversion tool drawings as likely the most accurate ever produced.

Notice the flaws in the southwest wall.  The seals began to give way in this corner shortly after construction.  The damaged seals as evidenced and known in the 1800�s was part of the demise of the structure as discussed in Volume Two of the book, The Solomon Series: Great Pyramid Mystery Resolved. 

As we examine the east wall in the drawing as an example we see the builders used five stones to span the 17 foot width of the room, making the average stone less that 4 feet is size.  Further since there is five tiers high in a 19 foot tall room the height of the stones is less than 4 feet.  The graphic representation from over 150 years ago demonstrates the stones aren�t nearly as big as we were once led to believe.  Understand as well that these are the �liners� made of pink granite.  The locally quarried lime rock behind these stones is believed to be haphazardly cut/stowed irregularly broken and handled lime rock filler.  As you explore our other evidences such as the �niche� in the erroneously labeled �Queen�s Chamber�, the dig profile of �Mamun�s Hole�, and other areas we see loose filler was used throughout the structure.  The use of irregular stone, mortar, etc is part of what has allowed the structure to stand as long as it has.

As pointed out in the miracle book series presented by Ted Whidden

As we focus once again at the �inversion tool� or so-called �coffer� we see the rough impact of multiple stone movements likely caused the breakage to the corner.  Further research allows the viewer of this photo set to note the dust/lines in the floors and stones of the space, relating them to the internals of the box.  One can easily see the practical application of this stone box as an inversion tool.

As we look at the next photo we see that more than 100 years ago observation was likely made that the box was too long for a coffer, and too narrow.  Here we see a group of folks sitting on the inversion tool admiring the space.  What do you think of the inversion tool now?  No dead bodies were ever here. The space was found sealed behind three walls and empty.  The "sarcophagus" was found to be damaged by the original discovery, therefore it was damaged during construction of the space...Possibly?   The "coffer idea" is likely a hoax, isn�t it?

Here is a close-up photo of the edge of the inversion tool/coffer.  Notice it is not ornate, irregular cut, and the site of a work in progress. This photo and the one above demonstrates heavy wear over an extended time as if this was a construction tool, NOT a sarcophagus.

Here is the entry way into the "King's Chamber".  PLEASE UNDERSTAND this is a forced entry through a solid wall, wherein the "explorers" broke out the rock sealing mechanism at their floor level because it was the easiest route to penetrate to the space. The opening forced by explorers is just about the size of the "coffer" or Inversion tool.   Look at the walls and the small (low) entry way.  Not likely a tomb, is it?  Once again we see an entry (hallway) that shares an outer extremity/wall.  Looks like a mechanical consideration for moving slabs from up the ramp to into a room.  Nothing more. 

Look now at the photo which follows.  The current entry way is only as high as one tier of stone.  It is likely formed by default well after the stone slabs were installed above.  Notice also what is probably the largest stone set in the entire structure.  Very few people are aware, but if you look at the north wall of the upper room towards the Grand Gallery the second tier is the largest stone set in the structure.  Once they loaded the floor two slabs high equaling the height of one tier of stone (and/or height of the coffer), we see the opening in this wall would have allowed maneuvering of the slabs into the room. 

LOOK!  The large stone slab set on the north wall was likely erected AFTER the stone slabs for the overhead were mobilized into the space, inverted, and landed topside�����

(This part is more precisely explained in the book series.) NOW look at the room in a new way (Go back to the drawing above).  If the south wall was completed prior to handling and inversion, and the north wall was only partial as we see (imagining the large north wall slab set removed), then we see an amazing phenomena.  The �short� wall on the north would not allow as many workers overhead as the completed �south wall�.  Can you see this?  Do you realize that if we had more workers on the south wall than on the north wall, and if the south wall workers had greater control over the inversion process, then we would EXPECT the corner of the inversion tool to break off PRECISELY as we see in the photo!!!  Notice the first photo is taken from the east looking west, with the southeast corner of the coffer damaged!  Hallelujah!  Ted Whidden has done it again!  Hundreds of mysteries solved in every book!

Get the free download that shows you the reason for the damages sited in the 1800's surveys!

www.SolomonSeries.com/pdfs/RockTumbler-Layout2.zip  

www.SolomonSeries.com/pdfs/TheInversionConcept-Model.zip 

Ted_Whidden's_Fulcrum_Stones-Model.pdf

The findings in this unique research team that Ted has assembled will continue to uncover and reveal hundreds of mysteries in virtually every text.  The alignment tools employed are amazing.  From stones, architecture, and archaeology, to Egyptology, social issues, and theology.  This is the best, most level-headed, and grounded approach to ancient studies in the world.  Whidden and his team are setting a new standard for integrity in the world, and the exploration field.

See our Video Library for Videos on these tools/techniques.